Conversations Concerning Us

Introduction             This paper will seek to provide insight and analysis into Clark Pinnock’s thinking on biblical revelation. This will be somewhat of a historical review, beginning with where Pinnock was and ending with where he is now. The goal is to track how his thinking has changed and what effects these changes have had. Along with the analysis will be intermittent critique. The critique will include his previous and current beliefs about biblical revelation. I want to know if there was something about his early thinking that may have led to his adjustments later on. Based on the analysis of Pinnock’s earlier and later beliefs, I hope to provide insight into things modern people can do/ think to avoid ending up in the same position (practical application). Ultimately, the purpose of this writing is to be both instructive and critical (i.e., lessons learned). What is provided below will not be an exhaustive account of Pinnock’s total theological thinking but solely focused

  Introduction             As argued for in the previous two sections (papers), we have discovered that the Bible has been inspired by God and is also inerrant. Those points do not need to be restated here but it in some respects has to do with the character of God. It is God’s character and knowledge (partially/ His plan) that he desires to give humanity. His character traits can be seen in the scriptures and also provide justification for thinking the scriptures are both inspired and inerrant. Next, the authority of Scripture is the next step in the building process. If the Bible is inspired (by God) and also inerrant, then it would seem likely that it would have authority. Authority             The concept of authority is one that is looked down upon in our current age. The term itself spurs on looks of disgust and as a blight against self-autonomy. However, the modern context is not devoid of the concept of authority because, even though many decry the idea, it is still preva